Total Pageviews
Thursday, December 30, 2004
About the EXPERTease article
Wednesday, December 29, 2004
Last phase of the project
I have been looking at the draft article we have been working on and have added substantially to it. It hasn't taken much work as I have been able to incorporate material I have written for other papers. Starting to feel the benefit now! It will need substantial revision to tie it all together and make it read easily.
It occurs to me that if we can get something ready before the WebCT conference, we could get published fairly quickly afterwards while it was fresh in people's minds and before the end of the COMETproject.
Mark: That sounds great. What do you want me to do? Will you send me what you have done already, please?
Tuesday, November 30, 2004
Wednesday, November 24, 2004
Useful links for the toolkit page - please add to!
LIST OF USEFUL SITES FOR TOOLKIT
Friday, November 05, 2004
Saturday, October 30, 2004
Duke to Provide Freshmen With iPods (Duke University) - 10E20 Website Design Latest News
Another item about Duke and iPods. They are spending about $500,000 on this! but looks like it will be carefully evaluated and supported.
Duke News & Communications
An iPod for all undergraduates at Duke university! Saw an item about this on the BBC World News while on holiday.
Thursday, October 14, 2004
JotSpot - new Wiki concept
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
X�M | Migo Make any PC your PC! | Migo USB Products plus more...
Loads more info. But it is very expensive! Demo shows how it works.
Final summary for WebCT conference
Monday, October 11, 2004
Sunday, October 10, 2004
WebCT conference submission summary
An information skills tutorial, EXPERTease, hosted within WebCT, was developed by Edge Hill. Success was achieved in the 2003 Times Higher/ LTSN eTutor of the Year competition. Scaling up and embedding across subjects has been enabled with a toolkit to support staff with the tutorial’s administration, adaptation, delivery and moderation. Included as a ‘hidden’ content module within EXPERTease tutorials, its evaluation demonstrates this model has potential for wider use within the Institution’s WebCT courses.
What do you think?
Not sure about 'demonstrates'. Any other suggestions? Indicates? Suggests? Proves? Shows? Recommends?
Saturday, October 09, 2004
blinkx
Once everything is indexed it the search is so quick, it is amazing.
Why not give it a go. Unfortunately it will only do local drives so I don't think it will work at work.
Friday, October 08, 2004
Tuesday, October 05, 2004
Or is it a framwork ...?
evalKit - a directory of ICT evaluation tools and toolkits
What are toolkits?
"Toolkits are decision-making frameworks based on expert models. They generally aim to deliver improvement for their users' practice by supporting them in assessing and improving outcomes for both individual and institutional practice."
Not really a definition that suits ours but I don't think that is a problem.
Monday, October 04, 2004
Third draft of WebCT Conference abstract
Theme: Enabling learning: Effective instructional practices and flexible design models
An information skills tutorial, EXPERTease, hosted within WebCT, was developed as a project within the key skills strand of Edge Hill’s HEFCE funded COMET project. The tutorial achieved success in the 2003 Times Higher/ LTSN eTutor of the Year competition. The development brought together information professionals and learning technologists to incorporate an understanding of pedagogical and technological issues into the finished product. Nevertheless, much incidental learning occurred due to the team’s organic, constructivist approach, focusing on the probable experience of the user.
Sharing knowledge gained through the development process, scaling up and embedding the tutorial within a range of subject curricula was enabled by the creation of a toolkit. The toolkit supports staff in administration, adaptation, delivery and moderation of the tutorial. To ensure that detailed instructional materials are to hand at point of need, the toolkit is included as a ‘hidden’ content module within EXPERTease tutorials and the project team has carefully evaluated use. This model has potential for wider use within the Institution’s WebCT courses.
Workshop participants will access the tutorial and toolkit, and share the evaluation and lessons learned. There will also be an opportunity for participants to exchange their experiences of developing and using similar toolkits.
200 words
Sunday, September 26, 2004
EXPERTease lite: interactive workbook
Sections are:
- Cover
- Contents (with links to the pages from there)
- About this workbook
- Using e-resources at home
- Tracing reading list items
- Using subject dictionaries
- Finding journal articles
- Referencing and plagiarism
I'm very pleased with what I have done so far but like every time, I am not too good with the look or the words. It's a shame I can't upload it for public view and feedback. I want it to be saved as a pdf with hypertext links to animations and Informs embedded in the pages. To live on the M: drive where Sports students will access virtually all of their course material until such time as they have something on WebCT.
Issues to be resolved include:
Will the links within the document and the external ones work within a pdf?
Will the pdf like my formatting? It can sometimes be quirky.
What about accessibility? Could I make the pdf work with a text reader. Can I add the equivalent of alt tags to images and links?
Thursday, September 23, 2004
Technology Infusion and School Change
Article on professional development models - any ideas for WebCT?
Wednesday, September 22, 2004
WebCT Conference - Barcelona
200 word abstract of the proposal and 75 word description of the presentation
Conference themes are:
- Changing mindsets: Strategies for institutional change
- Deploying enterprise e-learning: Strategies for success
- Driving student success: Attracting, supporting and retaining learners
- Empowering educators: Professional development models and methods
- Enabling learning: Effective instructional practices and flexible design models
- Expanding boundaries: New opportunities, markets, and uses of WebCT
- Integrating the campus: Technical solutions and extended uses
- Measuring outcomes: Student achievement and course success
- Optimising Resources: Elements of e-learning implementation
- Partnering for success: Multi-institution and consortium challenges and solutions
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
Journal article
Saturday, September 11, 2004
Friday, September 10, 2004
Task to set scene for EXPERTease
Activity: Introduction to thinking critically about information
Aims:
To provide participants with a practical task that will demonstrate the skills required in order to:
- Locate information using the web.
- Think critically about information that is found freely available on the web.
Learning Outcomes:
On completion of the task the participants will be able to:
- Identify common pitfalls in evaluating information found freely on the web.
- Compare web sites and discuss their credibility or otherwise.
- Identify a need to develop further skills in the critical appraisal of information.
Method and rationale:
Present participants with a task that incorporates some of the principles of problem-based learning. The task is an authentic problem that will involve the participants in a search for information that is freely available on the web. Having run a search for information, the participants will consider the information found and decide a course of action.
When completing the task, the participants need to feed back the search terms they used and how they constructed their search for information. They should provide a recommendation as required by the task but should also explain why they came to that decision.
Participants to work in groups of four or five and to discuss and debate the problem in order to reach an agreed course of action. Each group to feed back their search terms, decision and reasoning to the rest of the class. Facilitator to bring together common themes and summarise the process.
Facilitator to look for:
- Medical opinion backed up by evidence
- Reliance on personal opinion
- Evidence that participants have looked at more than one we site in order to check out their initial findings.
Note: The task can also be used an assessed task for an individual to submit.
The Task - To spray or not to spray?
The question to consider:
A neighbour knows that you are studying to become a nurse and so asks for your advice. She suffers from arthritis and has heard that it says on the Internet that spraying painful joints with WD40 can provide pain relief. She asks you if you could find out if this is true and advise her whether she should try it.
What you need to do:
Split into groups of four or five people.
Decide what you want to search for on the Internet.
Make a search and decide how you are going to consider the results.
Discuss your findings and reach a collective decision.
Be prepared to feed the following back to the whole class:
- Your Internet search terms
- What action you will recommend to your neighbour.
- Why you came to that decision
Saturday, September 04, 2004
Adding Sound to a PowerPoint
I can follow this quite well. It can be done wthin the PowerPoint Presentation or outside. Will have to try both. At the mment, I favour from within PowerPoint but I will need to check if this will work in WebCT or will I need to upload separate sound files also.
On a separate point, isn't it a useful page put together by Warwick. Isn't it the kind of thing we should be doing ... I ask of no one in particular!
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
Sylvia's IST and audit now working
Also Damien has fixed the Audit page so it will be ok for the demo to Salford on Friday.
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
Community Wiki
I might be able to use some of the content when drafting a guide(s) on becoming eliterate - writing discussion content.
Monday, August 30, 2004
Internet Resources Newsletter
Directory of syndicated feeds
Friday, June 18, 2004
Monday, June 14, 2004
Poster for CLTR
Sunday, June 13, 2004
BBC - collective - Homepage
Came across this in the Weekend Guardian. Part of the BBC site but is co-web/weblog in organisation.
Thursday, June 10, 2004
Back to Wikis again
Monday, June 07, 2004
Sunday, June 06, 2004
Abstract - Developing an online information skills tutorial for NHS users
Background Information.
The Library and Information Resource Centre at University Hospital Aintree is managed by Edge Hill College of Higher Education, and has contracts to supply library and information services to four NHS Trusts: Aintree Hospitals Trust, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, South Sefton Primary Care Trust. Staff at the Library and Information Resource Centre (LIRC) have developed dedicated Web pages for its NHS users, and through these pages they can access many clinical information resources, including nationally, regionally and locally procured electronic journals, databases and electronic books. In order for LIRC users to fully understand and manipulate such resources now requires a high level of information literacy. Therefore developing information literacy skills in users has been identified as a priority by the LIRC team.
Project
The LIRC team have developed a health information skills tutorial, which takes users through all aspects and stages of information literacy and use of specific health information resources. The LIRC team have encountered many obstacles when using traditional face to face teaching and learning methods, including space, physical resources and in particular time commitments from those users undertaking information skills training. The new tutorial has been developed so that it may be delivered online through the use of a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE), in this instance through WebCT. This mode of delivery means that extremely busy clinicians and users of the LIRC are able to learn online in their own time, and most importantly, at their own pace.
The Tutorial
This online tutorial contains six units, and first unit provides the context to the learning of information literacy and includes an online self-audit. This self-audit aims to link questions to sections of the tutorial, thus identifying participants' skills gaps and the sections of the tutorial where these gaps can be addressed.
The six units of the tutorial deliver teaching and learning via a balance of:
- Textual information
- Interactive learning opportunities (i.e. the use of animated representations of abstract concepts for participants to follow)
- Guided searches of live electronic information resources (where the users is invited to view an electronic information resource being used in a particular context)
- Summative interactive quizzes at the end of each unit.
- Activities for users of the tutorial to undertake.
The paper will demonstrate the pedagogical and technological developments of the online information skills tutorial, and will include evaluative data from a pilot of NHS learners who have been studying information skills using the online tutorial. The paper will also illustrate the online teaching and learning processes that underpin the tutorial and will draw upon the reflections of both the users and of the LIRC staff. Finally the paper will also attempt to demonstrate the effects that interactive online learning has on NHS staff competencies in using information resources.
Check out the soundblox
Friday, June 04, 2004
JavaScript RSS Box Viewer 1.0RC
The list of BBC feeds is available here
Loads of library feeds
It is very easy to change which feed we feature. Could have a feed of the week. Not sure how Auricle have done theirs.
RSS Feed
Visit from HEFCE
Le Poll est arrive!
New Poll feature
I suppose being nosey, I would like to know how the outcome would be published or what the runing total was or how many other people had voted. Otherwise, it is a bit of a meaningless exercise. Sorry! Auricle doesn't really seem to do anything with theirs but it looks good. I think these things only work if we can identify a valid reason for doing them.
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Journal Publication Information
The International Journal for Digital Information Research and Use
Purpose and Scope
Online Information Review is a bi-monthly international refereed journal concentrating on digital information sources, systems and services. The journal’s primary focus is broadly on the application of theory to practical aspects of online and digital information creation, storage, retrieval and use in academic, corporate, and scientific contexts. Papers on all aspects of information retrieval, including software developments and human-computer interaction issues, are welcomed, as are contributions on new technologies, including processors, storage media and devices, networks, and software of use in the field of interactive information and data. OIR publishes research-oriented contributions, theory-based analyses and practice-based discussions of new developments and applications, as well as regular review and research-in-progress sections, a professional reading section and a ‘savvy searching’ column.
The Editor is supported by an international Editorial Board, and prospective authors are invited to contact either the Editor or Editorial Board members to discuss possible submissions. Papers ready for submission should be sent electronically to the Editor for review.
Online Information Review may be accessed at
Article Presentation
Articles should be between 3000 and 6000 words in length, although shorter communications dealing with more immediate issues or research in progress, responding to points raised in articles and raising new issues for discussion will also be considered. Such items should be up to 1500 words in length. Articles should be sent to the Editor as an e-mail attachment together with a brief autobiographical note, 1-6 keywords, an abstract of approximately 150 words and a suggested title. References should be in name/date format in the text, for example (Jones 1999, p. 255), with full bibliographic references at the end of the paper.
Copyright
Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work in not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty.
Review Procedure
Each paper is reviewed by the Editor and, if it is judged suitable for this publication, is then sent to one or more referees (usually members of the Editorial Board). Based on their recommendations, the Editor then decides whether the paper should be accepted as is, revised or rejected.
How to Submit
Manuscripts or outlines of proposed articles should be submitted to the Editor by e-mail:
EDITOR
Dr G E Gorman, FLA FRSA
School of Information Management
Victoria University of Wellington
PO Box 600
Wellington 6015
New Zealand
Tel: +64 4 463 5782
Fax: +64 4 463 5446
E-mail: gary.gorman@vuw.ac.nz
Fame at last!
Dear Mr Martin
The Editorial Board of Online Information Review have taken note of your recent presentation at the following conference:
COMET 2 Conference 2004 - "E-ffectiveness - making a difference"
on the topic of:
Expertease Online Information Skills Tutorial
We feel that the content of this presentation may be of interest to our readers. If you would like to publish a version of your presentation, or an article on another relevant topic, please could you contact me.
Regards,
Gary Gorman
We subscribe to this journal through ProQuest Nursing Journals. The journal is published by MCB which is known for high quality journals in the field of Business and Management. I'm very pleased about this!
Tuesday, June 01, 2004
Auricle update
Also like the quick poll software they have added. Again, something we could use on the T&L or Learning Services web pages or within WebCT to check satisfaction or understanding?
Poster notes
Deadline date for poster
I can't seem to find the notes we sketched out, have you got them?
Friday, May 28, 2004
ATHENS sorted for web version
Thursday, May 27, 2004
My first Wiki experience
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
Tuesday, May 25, 2004
CLTR conference poster presentation
Basically (!) it was a bastardised version of Lindsey's New York E-Lit abstract.
Need to sort out publicity. Small fold-up handouts.
Also need to design poster - speak to JD about laminating and best way to do it
---------------------------------
Presenter
Mark Roche, Learning Technology Development Officer, Learning Services
Biography and interests
Mark helps staff develop courses in WebCT as well as using other technologies to open up the possibilities for staff to enhance their teaching.
Title of session
EXPERTease – a case study in developing an online resource
Type of session
Poster
Session outline
Collaboration between learning technologists and information specialists has resulted in an innovative and flexible approach to facilitating information literacy through use of WebCT and the application of the SCONUL ‘seven pillars’ model.
At Edge Hill, we have taken the decision to develop our own tutorial. This is after discussion and collaboration with colleagues across the institution who are themselves involved in improving students learning and who wish to see them engage with technology and electronic information sources.
Our tutorial, EXPERTease, is rapidly becoming a valuable contribution to the developing e-literacy of students and staff within the institution. We believe this is because it incorporates an understanding of the technological and pedagogical issues as well as the information literacy content.
Although the tutorial’s learning outcomes are concerned with information literacy, there have been unexpected outcomes that suggest that it develops e-literacy. Many users report that the tutorial has also increased their confidence in using technology, the communication tools within WebCT and applying the appropriate protocols necessary for communicating in a virtual learning environment.
The tutorial forms part of the Student Support strand of the COMET 2 project.
EXPERTease has recently been awarded second runner up in the Times Higher/ LTSN e-Tutor of the Year competition. Judging criteria evaluated innovative practice, sound pedagogic design and implementation and high levels of interactivity.
So far the tutorial has been customised to meet the particular needs of Health and Education students but it can be easily adapted to fit the needs of other subjects.
We now face the challenge of scaling up and succession planing to ensure the tutorial passes from small-scale project to embedded in our service delivery.
Participant’s benefits
They will develop skills, knowledge and see the ‘art of the possible’
Engaging participants
Through opportunities for discussion.
AV Requirements
None
Friday, May 21, 2004
E-Tutor of the Year 2003
Thursday, May 20, 2004
Generalists IST updated
Update! Oops. This was apparently customised and now i have lost all the customisation. I will have to start to document the courses to stop this happening.
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
Rachel writes
I was wondering if we could meet next week to look at Aintree adapting Expertease (Steve to do the work) and then what I do with it. I can bring you the abstract of what I have to do for the conference...Kindly written by Leo then of course he leaves and the paper gets accepted!!!
My simplistic plan is to adapt then pilot with two lots of NHS staff...Primary care staff based out in the community and then maybe some from Roz's groups who are doing leadership etc. I would have to be piloting in July up to early August as I am supposed to send the full presentation in 8th August..the conference isn't until 6th Sep..I wasn't going to write it until the night before."
This means nothing to me? What conference? What presentation? Any ideas?
Oh and Steve touching my Expertease! NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's mine. I realise that I have to let go eventually but it will be hard.
Sunday, May 16, 2004
AhA Moment!
The tutorial works for people who are novices or experts at their subject and information literacy because: the content is a logical progression through the information literacy competencies.
Subject/Info lit novices are supported throughout the tutorial by the structure, content, context, guided searches, animations. Guided searches become more demanding and compelx as the tutorial progresses. The reflective activities are written to encourage users to relate their own (no-subject) experience to the activities.
Subject experts/info lit novices are supported in the same way, however, they are able to relate the material they are provided with to what they already know about the subject and the research process. I would envisage that these users would use the tutorial in a more tailored, focussed way that fills the gaps in their understanding. The reflective activities are crucial as a means of articulating the connections they were making.
